Institutional repositories and academic bibliographies have traditionally been thought of as integrated systems with cataloging workflows, file management, user management and a powerful search engine frontend for end-users.
This integration provided users with one common look and feel, but system implementers often ended up with monolithic systems capable only of very specialized tasks. Libraries often find themselves creating and installing separate cataloging projects with some of the same workflows as institutional repositories, but with different end results.
As an example: Lund University has a publication-publishing platform providing an open access repository to researchers. Within the same environment, they need to manage students' papers with different data input concerns. Each of these systems has its own notion of cataloging of publication metadata, providing a search interface and providing record import and export. They differ in user base, metadata storage, indexing and editing rules.
At Ghent University, the management of scanned books and articles requires the same metadata and file upload concerns as for the institutional repository, but the databases here also differ in workflows, access management, and user management.
Bielefeld, Lund and Ghent University each have lively development communities where many library-related services are created with common toolsets. The institutions share the basic toolsets to provide database interactions, creating web applications and file storage. It should be observed, however, that these tools all work on very low-level services: storage of data and writing web applications. Library applications also have higher-level code or building blocks, in addition to low-level functionality, that can be reused/shared in different applications. Examples are:
In 2010, the decision was taken to make a major redesign of the existing software platform and to make it open source. The aim of the redesign is to enhance the flexibility of the software, and to add new functionalities as plug-ins to a core framework. This redesign has been broken down into two sub-projects:
As a first step Lund, Ghent and Bielefeld will provide the source code of the Catmandu project under an open license, as this will form the basis of future development.
LibreCat is an open collaboration. Currently the three Universites of Lund, Gent and Bielefeld provide freely available tools for library and research services. We believe that LibreCat is a valuable set of applications and we would like to ensure its continued development for future innovations in the field of digital libraries and research services.
The applications should be perceived as supplementary tools to serve your unique local need without loosing interoperability and standardisation already achieved.
LibreCat invites academic institutions with own development expertise to reuse and contribute. If you want to take an active part in LibreCat, please feel free to contact LibreCat Management.
LibreCat software published at https://github.com/LibreCat is free software without warranty, liabilities or support; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 or any later version. Every contributor is free to state her/his copyright.
The Universities of Lund, Ghent and Bielefeld all use the same platform for publication records management and self-archiving services. The basis for this platform was initially developed by Lund in 2006-2007 and then Ghent joined in 2008. In 2010, Bielefeld started using the software and joined as a third development partner.
Existing operational services can be found at: